Satellite IoT for Science: A Brief on Recent Advances in the Field

SpaceX

When Full Internet Connection is Required

In some cases, a sensor used by a scientist requires proprietary or custom software to be calibrated or accessed remotely. This is the case with many of our water quality and sediment sensors. When building these systems, a full Windows 10 (or 11) PC is required to run the sensor’s software, and a remote desktop view (via satellite internet) is used to manage the device out in the field.

Traditional Geostationary Satellite Internet

To achieve internet connections in remote locations in the past, traditional geostationary satellite connections have been used. There are problems with this type of design, though. The first is that geostationary satellites operate at a great distance from the earth’s surface, significantly slowing internet speeds. We have found with our existing geostationary systems in the Grand Canyon that internet speeds can be as slow as 1.5 kbps and only get as fast as 3 Mbps. A second issue is line-of-sight. In challenging geographic locations, such as the bottom of the canyon or along a mountain side, a poor view of a geostationary satellite can cause internet speeds to be reduced even further, or cause constant signal dropping, resulting in a lack of ability to retrieve sensor data effectively.

New LEO Satellite Internet

New LEO internet services, such as Starlink, are emerging as potential solutions to both of these issues. LEO satellites utilize a mesh network of constantly orbiting satellites to allow for internet connection (at least part of the day) in nearly any location with a view of the sky. Furthermore, because LEO satellites are much closer to the earth’s surface, they can transfer data at much faster rates than geostationary satellites (up to 1 Gbps, according to Starlink). High speed and more stable internet connections will allow for the expansion of current remote sensor systems with emerging technologies such as edge computing and machine learning in real time. While Starlink is the most prominent provider of this service right now, other companies are joining the field, and a robust LEO satellite internet market is likely to exist within the next 5–10 years.

Two Way “Texting” With Sensors

In some cases, sensor data is produced in small packets of bytes, such as weather station or soil moisture data. Full internet connectivity is overkill in these situations, and a simple “texting” approach is the most efficient. Relatively new LEO networks can help to reduce the equipment footprint of these sensor designs and provide dependable upload of data from very challenging locations, without the large infrastructure of satellite internet dishes.

Short-burst Satellite Data

If you have ever used a Garmin satellite communicator while out on a hike, you have used SBD (short-burst data). With the ever expanding LEO networks of both SpaceX (SWARM) and Iridium, it is possible to build satellite communicators to send sensor data to the cloud from nearly any location on Earth. SBD has such wide coverage that on a recent Grand Canyon river trip, I was able to text my wife and receive a response within 1–3 minutes almost anywhere within the canyon. Another advantage of SBD systems is that they consume very little power (compared to traditional satellite internet dishes and modems) and can be easily incorporated into 12V off-grid systems. The current limitations with SBD, though, are small data packet size (less than 250 bytes) and low frequency of data transmission (every 5–10 minutes).

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store